Peter Singer

http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/peter-singer-and-the-welfarist-position-on-the-lesser-value-of-nonhuman-life/

He has been saying these things for years starting in Animal Liberation, a book that was not about animal rights but earned Singer the title of "father of the animal rights movement." It is, however, nothing short of astonishing that so many animal advocates claim that there is no real difference between Singer's position and the abolitionist approach to animal rights.

What is surprising and shocking is that an "animal rights" movement promotes Animal Liberation as the "'bible'" of the modern animal rights movement" or embraces and promotes Singer as "father of the modern animal movement".

But the primary responsibility lies with animal advocates who have apparently never even bothered to read Animal Liberation before making it the "bible" and who have in any event not taken the time to think critically about the meaning of "animal rights."

oh, a úplne dole v sekcií "related posts" je o ňom písané viac

keby som vedela, čo je on zač, nikdy by som si jeho knihu nekúpila

Peter Singer nie je žiadny bojovník za práva zvierat v pravom zmysle slova. začala som čítať jeho knihu "Spisy o etickom žití" a zarazilo ma, že podporuje vivisekciu. na nete som sa dozvedela pravdu o tomto pánovi http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/peter-singer-supports-vivisection-why-are-you-surprised/

na příspěvěk reagoval Echelon1

Čítal som jeho knihu Osvobození zvířat, je to sila, odporúčam každému. V dokumente Delicate Balance hovorí o negatívnych dopadoch konzumácie mäsa na ľudské zdravie a v Animal People: The Humane Movement in America predstaví hnutie za práva zvierat. Bojovník!