rekkky

Animated adaption of TV show, produced by studio Paramount, has for sure its own audience, but as not involve spectator, I must say that without few very funny moments, it is a crazy mixture of scenes without further point. The plot works only in a few occasions and the rest of the entertainment is done by mini-scenes, but that is not enough. The quite positive result is mainly supported by some script lines, gags, jokes and interactions between characters. At the bottom line those short stories are without doubt better for shorter format of TV show. 2/3 of this movie could be consumable, but last 1/3 is total nonsense and it has no clue whatsoever.

Jake Gyllenhaal has again showed that he is very talented actor, who can bring movie to even higher level. At the same time he proved to chose correct options of the projects in recent years. Movie is filled with true metropolitan content and most of the footage is very realistically taken. The procedure of evolution from thief to the person, who affects content of TV news has few loopholes, but at the same time interesting points, so there is certain sustainability in the flow of the storyline. Movie is dealing with topic, which should’t be underestimated, because gaining of the horror for the mainstream is certainly done by this „business“ way and that should be alarming. With this in mind, makers of Nightcrawler made great work.

This kind of movie makes you think, it makes you think about various things and you have to be very careful, where your thoughts will be heading. Enemy is undoubtly complex piece of art, whose main idea might be expressed right at the beginning of all, but to have longer version there is a plenty of time for rethinking the content. Enemy is about human emotions, network of thoughts and psychlogical side of the movie is hidden behind audiovisual content very sophisticatedly. Either Anthony or Adam is played by Jake Gyllenhaal as they were himself, so personality disorder raises from the screen with brilliant shape. Last scene could be read with the meaning that scrapping the spider is not enough, so everything may start from the begining, right? Denis Villeneuve has great eye for spotting the important elements of present time and Enemy has its own qualities.

The document with main plot about easily gained datas (voluntarily transmised of informations by clinking on the button AGREE) has conclusion in direct witness of concrete cases (PRISM, Wikileaks, Spyfiles, Anonymus). Through this cases are creators trying to describe issues closely, thereby there should be bigger wave of realization that movement in the frame of online world is not free and without side effects.

Very creatively construed comedy, which can be seen from the outside as a simple matter, but this its the biggest magic and power. Main plot is not forced forward and the most important mission that fullfilment of a 20 years lasting dream is showed as natural and understandable, even if there are any obstacles ahead of you. Ostensibly dramatic family disputes are peppered by individual plots. The funniest thing is to see how François eventually overcome every stages and everything has positive ending. In progress of the content there are new elements, which can acts as allegory to real proccedure of famous „Old lady“, but this way of marketing is quite appropriate, because there are a lot of references without purpose of insulting someone. Very carefully is shown, how the journey of following the personal dream can have influence on outer world and at the end to put them together on your side. La grande Boucle is surprisingly glamorous and totally outstanding show with positive atmosphere, which last untill the end, because it is fueled by good factors (references to the doping causes, competing in sport, personal challenge, mass hysteria about world event).

Relatively short document, which mentions the most important milestones in the development of Armstrong’s lies about doping. The content is mainly focused on the facts, but it doesn’t go into the details as much as you would expect and anticipate. As a brief outline works document perfectly. To understand the case better, this material can appear as good guidance.

Some of the shots are very beautiful and they speak for themselves, because Tour de France is without a doubt the phenomen. Even though it is not dealing with all of the aspects, which were connected with team Telekom, there are many things, who can entertain. All in all it is a nice document with interesting insight to the backround of „la Grande Boucle“.

If it is supposed to be comedy with few action shots and the rest should be more or less static shooting of dialogues between Will Ferrell and Kevin Hart, then everything went perfectly well, because sporadic fun is taking the part. Get Hard has simple and not that funny plot as you might think at the beginning, but some of the script lines are hilarious and their provocative purpose is working. Anyway, most of the time you can wonder and observe, how anything like this can be made with budget 40 mil. $, but this is how Hollywood works and even below average comedy can gain over 106 mil. $ only from cinemas.

Thanks to Chasing legends the viewer is able to look behind the curtain of proffesional cycling team, which is fighting for succes in the middle of peloton on one and only Tour de France. This magnificent sport event with global impact is viewed during 2009 edition not only through background of team HTC Columbia, but also by personal thoughts of famous veterans and television commentators. This documentary works with original scenes from authors, but uses also material out of commercial broadcast. Attractive and dynamic editing brings this sport documentary to higher level. Even though I have seen it after few years have passed, it drew me into the storyline and it is possible to see all the beauty, but also the torment and suffering. Nicely done.

Documentary, which has several meanings and briefly talks about Lance Armstrong‘s biggest lie in the history of cycling and Tour de France itself. It represents close look on character of Lance Armstrong with consideration of development his case of doping untill the admission. It must be highlighted that since 1987, when he was 16, Lance Armstrong started proffesional career as thriatlete, which means that he was lying about doping more than 15 out of 25 years of his proffesional career. Document also puts into connection important things such as family, teammates, sponsors, governing bodies not only of cycling sport, fans, supporters and others. What stands out is the initiative, which supports the people affected by cancer. The Armstrong lie is worth of recognition and it is unique insight to the world of best cycling in the world. As the matter of fact, this documentary represents only tip of the iceberg among proffesional cyclists.